Media & theFacts

We help all media outlets, large and small, old and new, left, centrist, or right-leaning, written, audio, and video-based, strengthen their facts-first approach to journalism, without fear or favour, and we freely share our work with any organisation who values getting to the truth of an issue.

We’ve had some great win-wins, including:

                         

However, we have also had many frustrating experiences where we discovered major stories that the mainstream media (MSM) refused to share.

Below is a list of these wins and losses, under the headings of:

The Great
The Good
The Bad
The Ugly

NOTE: We’re not always notified by media about the coverage we get, so if you know of any credits missing from the list below, please let us know. We’ve ignored social media as the reposts/reshares are too great to track, however, these can often reach 50,000+ impressions so thank you to everyone who reshares our work!


The Great


The Good


The Bad

  • GDP per capita
    GDP is used as the headline figure, and often the only figure, by most media, even though GDP per Capita is a better measure of:

    • Productivity
    • Economic impacts on households
    • How well a country’s economy is going relative to its changing population.
      For example, some have downplayed our 2023 recession as a GDP drop of only “-0.1%”. However, GDP per capita decreased -0.7% since our population increased by a significant 35,000 in that quarter alone.
      We believe that Stats NZ, other government departments, ministers, politicians, and media should all lead with GDP per Capita as the primary metric and have GDP as the secondary metric.
  • Victimisations of Crime
    We discovered that Maori and Indian New Zealanders are far more likely to be the victims of crime. The former is sometimes covered by politicians and media, but no media published our fact on the impact to Indian New Zealanders. This was really disappointing.
  • Employee leave days
    The rapid increases here might seem good for employees, but they’re causing significant problems for employers to maintain productivity levels, profitability, and, therefore, jobs for the country. We haven’t seen any politicians or media speak about this.
  • Social and racial division
    Anecdotally, this feels like a significant issue for New Zealand right now but is rarely researched so it’s hard to know the true extent of the problem. It feels like most politicians, media, and researchers lack the courage to confront the facts when it comes to topics of division. This makes the rare work done by NZ Herald, Dynata, 1 News, and Verian even more valuable, so thank you for providing us with some quantitative evidence!

    • Off-one research:
      • NZ Herald and Dynata did a one-off piece of research and found that 2/3 of voters believe NZ has become more divided (except for 18-24-year-olds)
      • 1News Verian found that almost half of New Zealanders believe race relations are getting worse.
             
    • Regular pollsters:
      • IPSOS includes only “Race relations / racism” as an issue option rather than splitting those different terms out, only allows respondents to give their top three issues overall, and doesn’t ask for how good or bad each issue is going either.
      • Curia only asks for a top #1 issue, and doesn’t share their full issues list, but we believe they are not including a “Social unity / division” option.
      • For Kantar Public, we don’t know what they test. We only get a top ten list from what they do ask, and only  once per year.
      • For Essential, it appears as though they don’t test social/racial unity/division issue. We have contacted them to learn more.
  • Stuff and the ODT
    These are the only two MSM outlets who have refused to publish any of our facts to date despite offering them many breaking stories. We hope this will change.

The Ugly

  • Alphabetical bias in local elections
    • 19/78 (24%) of local councils ran alphabetical, not randomised, name lists on ballot papers.
    • In the Auckland local elections alone:
      • Surnames in the top 3 positions won >50% of election seats.
      • For the Local Board Members and Licensing Trustees:
        • Based on probability, candidates in the first three positions should have won 30% of the elections.
        • However, they won 57% = almost twice as many.
        • In other words, those 105 candidates in the top three positions won 20 out of 35 elections (a 1 in 5 chance) vs the other 323 candidates who only won 15 of the elections (a 1 in 22 chance). That’s a 4.4x difference in probability!
      • For the 6 Licensing Trustee Elections, all of those who received the most votes were either listed in the top 3 or bottom 2.
      • Candidates with surnames starting with A, B or C won over 1/3 (12/35) of those Auckland elections (Allan, Amosa, Atkinson, Autagavaia, Batucan, Bonham, Brown, Carter, Catchpole, Churton, Cole, Cooper).
    • There is also alphabetical bias, and not surname randomisation, in our general elections.
    • As mentioned earlier, only two independent media outlets covered this important democracy story:

If you’re a media outlet willing to shine a light on truths like this, please let us know!


Other Media Qs

Q. You’re media yourself, and just as bad as the rest
A. In many ways, we have become a media platform now, especially for issues or facts that can’t be found anywhere else. And, we recognise that trust in media is declining, but that is exactly why we started and why we have a role to play in increasing that trust again. We are committed to working with other media outlets, especially the MSM, and want see a return to greater facts-first journalism, free of fear or favour towards any political or social agenda.

Q. Why do you cite references to more extreme media outlets?
A. We have a philosophy of talking to anyone who is interested in covering the truth, even if we don’t agree with everything they say. Whenever interviewed, we always come back to the facts on issues and don’t stray from this even when the interviewer tries to push us to. This can make us a frustrating interviewee for those seeking more opinionated soundbites.

Q. Who is your media spokesperson
A. Geoff.


See also